0121 507 1030 | 07590 396168 (24/7)
35 Bull Street, Birmingham, B4 6AF
Townend House, Walsall, WS1 1NS
0121 507 1030 | 07590 396168 (24/7)

That the alleged conduct falls within the statutory definition of terrorism
Intent to support, prepare for, or encourage terrorist activity
Knowledge or recklessness regarding the terrorist purpose
Relevant Legislation:
Terrorism Act 2000
Terrorism Act 2006
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019
Maximum Penalties:
Lengthy custodial sentences, including life imprisonment for the most serious offences
Key Legal Definitions:
Terrorism: action designed to influence the government or intimidate the public for ideological purposes
Preparation: conduct intended to assist in carrying out terrorist acts
The Law
Terrorism
Terrorism offences involve allegations of preparing, supporting, encouraging, or participating in acts intended to influence the government or intimidate the public for ideological, political, or religious purposes.
These cases often arise from intelligence-led investigations and can involve significant police powers. Early legal advice is critical due to the seriousness of the allegations and the complexity of the law.


What the Prosecution Must Prove

How We Defend These Cases
Immediate advice and representation during arrest and questioning
Careful scrutiny of surveillance and digital evidence
Strategic challenge to prosecution case theory
Instruction of specialist experts where appropriate
Experienced representation in Crown Court terrorism proceedings
Common Evidence Used in These Cases
Digital evidence including phone downloads, online activity, and encrypted communications
Surveillance material and intelligence-based evidence
Forensic computer analysis
Statements from specialist counter-terrorism officers
Common Problems in Prosecution Cases
Over-reliance on intelligence rather than admissible evidence
Disclosure failures under CPIA
Misinterpretation of online content or communications
Breaches of statutory powers during arrest or detention
Abuse of process arguments
Potential Defences
Lack of intent or terrorist purpose
Innocent explanation for online or digital activity
Unlawful surveillance or procedural breaches
Insufficient or circumstantial evidence
Challenges to expert interpretation of digital material
Sentencing and Possible Outcomes
Sentences depend on the nature and seriousness of the offence
Aggravating factors include planning, sophistication, and harm risk
Mitigating factors may include limited involvement or early cooperation
Long-term consequences beyond sentencing, including restrictions and monitoring
Why Choose ASL
We are committed to delivering consistently strong results rooted in legal expertise and proven advocacy.
Experience
Our solicitors and advocates have extensive experience in Criminal Defence, Family Law, Road Traffic Offences, Immigration, and Civil Litigation.
Success Rate
We are proud of our strong record in achieving favourable outcomes in complex & high-stakes cases, from serious criminal allegations to sensitive family matters.
Client Care Standards
Your case is handled with dignity, respect, and complete confidentiality. We provide:
-
Clear communication without legal jargon
-
Regular case updates and guidance
-
Support through every stage of the legal process

