top of page
Group 620.png

0121 507 1030 | 07590 396168 (24/7)

Untitled.jpg

Evidence gathered during interviews may be used to establish guilt

The prosecution must ensure interviews comply with legal and procedural standards

Any admissions must be voluntary and corroborated where possible



Relevant Legislation:

  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE)

  • Codes of Practice for Police Conduct and Interviewing

Key Legal Points:

  • Right to legal advice before and during interviews

  • Right to remain silent, with exceptions for certain statutory offences

  • Interviews must be conducted fairly and in accordance with PACE

The Law

Representation in Police Interviews

Police interviews are a crucial stage in any criminal investigation, whether for minor offences or serious allegations.
Having legal representation ensures your rights are protected, helps prevent self-incrimination, and reduces the risk of mistakes that could impact your case.

Rectangle 4557
Rectangle 4541

What the Prosecution Must Prove

Rectangle 4542
How We Defend These Cases

  • Attend police interviews with clients to ensure rights are upheld

  • Provide clear guidance and preparation before questioning

  • Challenge procedural and evidential issues

  • Advise on responses to minimise risk of self-incrimination

  • Support clients throughout the investigation and court proceedings

Common Evidence Used in These Cases

  • Statements given during police interviews

  • CCTV or recording of interviews

  • Witness testimony corroborating or contradicting the interview

  • Digital or forensic evidence referenced during questioning

Common Problems in Prosecution Cases

  • Failure to follow PACE Codes of Practice

  • Misleading or coercive questioning by police

  • Inadequate legal representation at the interview stage

  • Improper note-taking or recording errors

  • Admissions made under duress or without advice

Potential Defences

  • Challenge procedural breaches in the interview

  • Dispute coercion, intimidation, or misleading questioning

  • Question voluntariness of admissions

  • Argue for exclusion of improperly obtained evidence

Sentencing and Possible Outcomes

  • Proper legal representation can prevent early admissions affecting case outcome

  • Ensures fair trial and protection of rights

  • May reduce likelihood of prosecution relying on flawed evidence

  • Early intervention often leads to more favourable outcomes

Why Choose ASL


We are committed to delivering consistently strong results rooted in legal expertise and proven advocacy.

Experience

Our solicitors and advocates have extensive experience in Criminal Defence, Family Law, Road Traffic Offences, Immigration, and Civil Litigation.

Success Rate


We are proud of our strong record in achieving favourable outcomes in complex & high-stakes cases, from serious criminal allegations to sensitive family matters.

Client Care Standards

Your case is handled with dignity, respect, and complete confidentiality. We provide:

  • Clear communication without legal jargon

  • Regular case updates and guidance

  • Support through every stage of the legal process

Fast, confidential support when you need it most.

Get Legal Advice in Minutes

bottom of page