top of page
Group 620.png

0121 507 1030 | 07590 396168 (24/7)

Untitled.jpg

That the defendant knew, or ought to have known, the premises were being used for drug activity

That the defendant allowed or failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it

Proof beyond reasonable doubt

The Law



Relevant Legislation:

  • Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Maximum Penalties:

  • Up to 14 years’ imprisonment depending on involvement and severity

  • Unlimited fines and potential confiscation of property

Key Legal Definitions:

  • Premises: any property, including homes, businesses, or land

  • Permitting: allowing or failing to prevent the use of the premises for drug-related activity

Permitting Premises to be Used for Drugs

This offence occurs when a person knowingly allows their property—home, business, or land—to be used for the production, supply, or use of controlled drugs.
Cases often involve landlords, business owners, or householders whose premises are exploited. Early legal advice is essential to protect your rights and minimise legal risk.

Rectangle 4557

What the Prosecution Must Prove

Rectangle 4542
How We Defend These Cases

  • Immediate legal advice and representation at police interviews

  • Detailed review of premises use and evidence linking the defendant

  • Challenge knowledge, consent, and procedural compliance

  • Expert advocacy in Magistrates’ or Crown Court

  • Strategic defence planning to achieve the best possible outcome

Common Evidence Used in These Cases

  • Police surveillance or intelligence reports

  • Witness statements of illegal activity at the premises

  • Evidence of knowledge, such as communications or prior warnings

  • Physical evidence of drugs or paraphernalia on site

Common Problems in Prosecution Cases

  • Difficulty proving knowledge or intent

  • Misinterpretation of lawful activities as drug-related

  • Procedural errors during search or surveillance

  • Non-disclosure of evidence under CPIA

Potential Defences

  • Lack of knowledge of the illegal activity

  • Steps taken to prevent use of the premises

  • Property rented or used by others without consent or control

  • Procedural errors by police during investigation

Sentencing and Possible Outcomes

  • Sentences vary based on the type of drugs and level of involvement

  • Aggravating factors include repeated or serious use of premises

  • Mitigation may include lack of knowledge or proactive prevention

  • Custodial sentences are possible, particularly for Class A involvement

Why Choose ASL


We are committed to delivering consistently strong results rooted in legal expertise and proven advocacy.

Experience

Our team of lawyers have extensive 25+ years experience in all aspects of Criminal Defence and Family Law matters.

Success Rate


We are proud of our strong record in achieving favourable outcomes across London, Birmingham, Manchester, and the wider UK, from serious criminal cases to sensitive family law matters.

Client Care Standards

Your case is handled with dignity, respect, and complete confidentiality. We provide:

  • Clear communication without legal jargon

  • Regular case updates and guidance

  • Support through every stage of the legal process

Get Legal Advice in Minutes

Speak to a Defence Solicitor Now

bottom of page